In the article "Computers Should Supplement Textbooks, Not Replace Them," Gerry Barker proposes a heated question to his Fort Worth Star-Telegram readers: Should computers replace textbooks? Overwhelmingly, 218 people replied that computers should not replace textbooks, thirty-five that they should, and a mere eleven people remained undecided. This debate has become one of great importance in Texas, where it is a real possibility that textbooks may be sent to the graveyard and succeeded by computers.

The 218 people against the idea of computers being the dominant teaching device have several reasons for their decision. Some people think that the cost would be too high, while others feel that todayís youth have already been "dumbed down" enough and that computers will only contribute to their laziness and lack of common sense. These people believe, if a computer can add, subtract, and check spelling and grammar for students, then what motivation will prompt students to learn these things for themselves? Whether it is the cost of or the laziness promoted by computers, the majority of people are against computers replacing textbooks.

One person said that "the cost of such a practice would not be practical" (256). Others in favor of computers feel that the cost would be well worth it for the valuable information that only technology can provide. While money, as usual, is a primary problem, some people are simply old-fashioneded; they believe that "kids have already become quite lazy" (254), and that computers would only make it easier to be lazy. On the other hand, computers would allow students to experience a higher standard of technology unavailable through using textbooks alone.

It seems that, while there is always room for improvement, textbooks will outlast the craze for newness. Out of all of the personal excerpts included in this article, only five are in favor of discarding textbooks and using computers. The other twenty-one testimonials urge that textbooks be kept. A few people thought it would be best to have both computers and textbooks work together to help produce well balanced students. Until more money is located, and all the old fashioned people die out, a compromise is the best that students can hope for, and perhaps all they need.

Barker, Gerry. "Computers Should Supplement Textbooks, Not Replace Them." CyberReader. 2nd ed. Ed. Victor J. Vitanza. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1999. 254-256.

Armstrong Atlantic State University's Homepage
Languages, Literature, and Philosophy Department's Homepage
Email Stacey Kelehear